A Meta-analysis of the Severity of Acute Pancreatitis (AP) in COVID-19 Infection.

Many studies have reported severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) affecting the gastrointestinal tract and causing gastritis, colitis, duodenitis and acute pancreatitis (AP). We conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate if SARS-CoV-2 infection (COVID-19 infection) affects the outcomes and severity of AP. We searched for articles in PubMed (MEDLINE), Cochrane Library, and clinicaltrials.gov databases and included studies comparing the outcomes of AP in patients with and without COVID-19. Our outcomes were the mean age of occurrence of AP, Charlson Comorbidity Index, incidence of idiopathic etiology of AP, severity of AP, incidence of necrotizing pancreatitis, need for intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and mortality between the two cohorts. We included five observational studies with a total population of 2,446 patients. Our results showed that in COVID-19 patients; AP had higher odds of having an idiopathic etiology (odds ratio, OR 3.14, 95% confidence interval, CI 1.36-7.27), be more severe (OR 3.26, 95% CI 1.47-7.49), had higher risk for pancreatic necrosis (OR 2.40, 95% CI 1.62-3.55), require ICU admission (OR 4.28, 95% CI 2.88-6.37) and had higher mortality (OR 5.75, 95% CI 3.62-9.14) than in patients without COVID-19 infection. Our study concluded that SARS-CoV-2 infection does increase the morbidity and mortality associated with AP and further large-scale multi-center studies are needed to confirm these results.

COVID-19: Factors Associated with the Psychological Distress, Fear and Resilient Coping Strategies among Community Members in Saudi Arabia.

(1) Background: COVID-19 caused the worst international public health crisis, accompanied by major global economic downturns and mass-scale job losses, which impacted the psychosocial wellbeing of the worldwide population, including Saudi Arabia. Evidence of the high-risk groups impacted by the pandemic has been non-existent in Saudi Arabia. Therefore, this study examined factors associated with psychosocial distress, fear of COVID-19 and coping strategies among the general population in Saudi Arabia. (2) Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in healthcare and community settings in the Saudi Arabia using an anonymous online questionnaire. The Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K-10), Fear of COVID-19 Scale (FCV-19S) and Brief Resilient Coping Scale (BRCS) were used to assess psychological distress, fear and coping strategies, respectively. Multivariate logistic regressions were used, and an Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR) with 95% Confidence Intervals (CIs) was reported. (3) Results: Among 803 participants, 70% (n = 556) were females, and the median age was 27 years; 35% (n = 278) were frontline or essential service workers; and 24% (n = 195) reported comorbid conditions including mental health illness. Of the respondents, 175 (21.8%) and 207 (25.8%) reported high and very high psychological distress, respectively. Factors associated with moderate to high levels of psychological distress were: youth, females, non-Saudi nationals, those experiencing a change in employment or a negative financial impact, having comorbidities, and current smoking. A high level of fear was reported by 89 participants (11.1%), and this was associated with being ex-smokers (3.72, 1.14-12.14, 0.029) and changes in employment (3.42, 1.91-6.11, 0.000). A high resilience was reported by 115 participants (14.3%), and 333 participants (41.5%) had medium resilience. Financial impact and contact with known/suspected cases (1.63, 1.12-2.38, 0.011) were associated with low, medium, to high resilient coping. (4) Conclusions: People in Saudi Arabia were at a higher risk of psychosocial distress along with medium-high resilience during the COVID-19 pandemic, warranting urgent attention from healthcare providers and policymakers to provide specific mental health support strategies for their current wellbeing and to avoid a post-pandemic mental health crisis.

Challenges of Telemedicine Implementation in Patients with Cardiovascular Diseases: Insight from a Single Center during COVID-19 Lockdown

Introduction Telemedicine is a desirable option for healthcare in Saudi Arabia. The challenges of telemedicine in cardiovascular care in Saudi Arabia are not known. The COVID-19 pandemic offered an unprecedented opportunity to identify real-life challenges of telemedicine in Saudi Arabia. We sought to identify the challenges of telemedicine among patients with cardiovascular diseases using the experience of the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods This is a cross-sectional survey-based study through a self-filled questionnaire. The questionnaire included demographic data, type of cardiovascular disease, and difficulties faced by the patients during the COVID-19 lockdown. Results 394 (60% male, mean age 51.4 ± 19.3 years) participated in the study. 30.3% had valve diseases, 26.4% had heart failure, and 24.1% had coronary artery disease. 45.6% reported difficulty with telemedicine during COVID-19 lockdown. Among those who have difficulties, almost half of the participants had difficulty with the cancellation of telemedicine appointments, and 15.5% had difficulty in getting medications. Conclusion Cancellation of telemedicine appointments and getting the medications were cardiovascular patients' main challenges during the COVID-19 lockdown. Telemedicine is a feasible option for the follow-up of chronic cardiovascular diseases. Therefore, it should be implemented to increase the availability of specialized cardiovascular care over a wide geographical area.

Psychological effect of COVID-19 pandemic on healthcare professionals of Yemen and coping strategies.

COVID-19 pandemic has triggered psychological stress such as anxiety and depression among people around the globe. Due to the nature of the job, healthcare professionals (HCPs) are at high risk of infection and are facing social stigma as well. This research was conducted with the objective to evaluate the psychological influence of the COVID-19 pandemic among HCPs in Yemen and the coping strategies adopted thereof. A web-based, as well as face-to-face cross-sectional study was carried out from July to December 2021 among HCPs of Yemen. The generalized anxiety disorder (GAD-7), patient health questionnaire (PHQ-9), and Brief-COPE scales were applied for the evaluation of anxiety, depression, and coping strategies. A total of 197 HCPs participated in the study where 28.4% and 43.1% had anxiety and depression respectively. The prevalence of both anxiety and depression in the majority were found of the minimal to none and mild categories (71.6% vs. 56.9% respectively). The respondents who had received training on COVID-19 had statistically significant lower GAD-7 scores than those who did not (6.32 vs. 8.02 respectively). A significant statistical difference was observed between physicians versus nurses regarding depression based on the working area (p < 0.05). The physician and pharmacist had a significant positive association with brief COPE scores at the 50th centile compared to other HCPs. The female respondents had statistically significant higher mean Brief COPE scores than male respondents (78.11 vs. 69.50 respectively). Our findings illustrate the requirement for efficient policies through administrative, clinical, and welfare perspectives from the regulatory body in preparedness and preventive measures towards such a pandemic that aids HCPs to provide service in a stress-free condition and assurance of a better healthcare system..

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on knowledge, perceptions, and effects of telemedicine among the general population of Pakistan: A national survey.

Background: Telemedicine is the provision of healthcare services through information and communication technology with the potential to mobilize all facets of the health sector to prevent the spread of COVID-19, provide quality healthcare, protect patients, doctors, and the public from exposure to disease, and reduce the burden on the healthcare system. This study aims to identify knowledge, perceptions, willingness to use, and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on telemedicine awareness. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted from 27 May 2020 to 17 June 2020 using the convenient sampling technique in the general population of Pakistan. Data were collected by designing an online questionnaire consisting of demographic information, knowledge, attitude perceptions, barriers, utilization, and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on telemedicine. Results: Of the 602 participants included in the study, 70.1% had heard about telemedicine, 54.3% had a good understanding of the definition of "telemedicine," 81.4% had not used telemedicine in the past, 29.9% did not know that telemedicine was available before the COVID-19 pandemic, and 70.4% responded that the COVID-19 pandemic had changed their attitudes toward telemedicine. Gender (p = 0.017) and family income (p = 0.027) had a significant association with the perception of the benefits of telemedicine. Conclusion: The knowledge and usage of telemedicine are lacking due to inadequate awareness and technology. The need of the hour is to maximize the application of telemedicine to overcome the deficiencies of the healthcare system. Hence, it is essential to increase awareness through various means and develop an appropriate infrastructure to attain maximum benefits from telehealth services.

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on knowledge, perceptions, and effects of telemedicine among the general population of Pakistan: A national survey

Background Telemedicine is the provision of healthcare services through information and communication technology with the potential to mobilize all facets of the health sector to prevent the spread of COVID-19, provide quality healthcare, protect patients, doctors, and the public from exposure to disease, and reduce the burden on the healthcare system. This study aims to identify knowledge, perceptions, willingness to use, and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on telemedicine awareness. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted from 27 May 2020 to 17 June 2020 using the convenient sampling technique in the general population of Pakistan. Data were collected by designing an online questionnaire consisting of demographic information, knowledge, attitude perceptions, barriers, utilization, and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on telemedicine. Results Of the 602 participants included in the study, 70.1% had heard about telemedicine, 54.3% had a good understanding of the definition of "telemedicine,” 81.4% had not used telemedicine in the past, 29.9% did not know that telemedicine was available before the COVID-19 pandemic, and 70.4% responded that the COVID-19 pandemic had changed their attitudes toward telemedicine. Gender (p = 0.017) and family income (p = 0.027) had a significant association with the perception of the benefits of telemedicine. Conclusion The knowledge and usage of telemedicine are lacking due to inadequate awareness and technology. The need of the hour is to maximize the application of telemedicine to overcome the deficiencies of the healthcare system. Hence, it is essential to increase awareness through various means and develop an appropriate infrastructure to attain maximum benefits from telehealth services.

Population mortality before and during the COVID-19 epidemic in two Sudanese settings: a key informant study (preprint)

Background Population mortality is an important metric that sums information from different public health risk factors into a single indicator of health. However, the impact of COVID-19 on population mortality in low-income and crisis-affected countries like Sudan remains difficult to measure. Using a community-led approach, we estimated excess mortality during the COVID-19 epidemic in two Sudanese communities. Methods Three sets of key informants in two study locations, identified by community-based research teams, were administered a standardised questionnaire to list all known decedents from January 2017 to February 2021. Based on key variables, we linked the records before analysing the data using a capture-recapture statistical technique that models the overlap among lists to estimate the true number of deaths. Results We estimated that deaths per day were 5.5 times higher between March 2020 and February 2021 compared to the pre-pandemic period in East Gezira, while in El Obeid City, the rate was 1.6 times higher. Conclusion This study suggests that using a community-led capture-recapture methodology to measure excess mortality is a feasible approach in Sudan and similar settings. Deploying similar community-led estimation methodologies should be considered wherever crises and weak health infrastructure prevent an accurate and timely real-time understanding of epidemics' mortality impact in real-time.

Risks of Cardiac Arrhythmia Associated with COVID-19 Vaccination: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to summarize the current evidence regarding the association between coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination and the risk of cardiac arrhythmia. MEDLINE, via PubMed and OVID, Scopus, CENTRAL, and Web of Science were searched using the relevant keywords to identify the relevant citations. Comprehensive Meta-analysis and Review Manager 5.4.1 were used for all the statistical analyses. Seventeen studies (n = 567,033,087 patients) were included. The pooled analysis showed that the incidence of cardiac arrhythmia post-COVID-19 vaccination with Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca, CoronaVac, and Sinopharm was 0.22%, 95% CI: (0.07% to 0.66%), 0.76%, 95% CI: (0.04% to 12.08%), 0.04%, 95% CI: (0.00% to 0.98%), 0.01%, 95% CI: (0.00% to 0.03%), and 0.03%, 95% CI: (0.00% to 18.48%), respectively. Compared to CoronaVac, Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca, and Sinopharm had a higher incidence ratio rate (IRR; 22-times, 76-times, 4-times, and 3-times higher), respectively. Likewise, Pfizer, Moderna, and AstraZeneca showed a higher IRR than Sinopharm (7.3-times, 25.3-times, and 1.3-times higher). The current evidence shows that the incidence rate (IR) of cardiac arrhythmia post-COVID-19 vaccination is rare and ranges between 1 and 76 per 10,000. mRNA vaccines were associated with a higher IR of arrhythmia compared to vector-based vaccines. Inactivated vaccines showed the lowest IR of arrhythmia.

Estrés percibido en deportistas mexicanos durante la pandemia por COVID-19: diferencias por sexo y nivel de rendimiento (Perceived stress in Mexican athletes during the COVID-19 pandemic: differences by gender and performance level)

One of the main consequences of the current COVID-19 pandemic is the impact on anxiety and stress levels. Among the factors that must be taken into account to evaluate the psychosocial impact of COVID-19 on athletes are sociodemographic factors, so the objective of this study was to analyze if the perception of stress depends on gender and performance level in Mexican athletes during the COVID-19 pandemic. The sample of this study was made up of 596 Mexican athletes, of both sexes (women = 40.4%) and aged between 13 and 40 years (M = 22.3, SD = 6.87). The athletes answered the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10) and a questionnaire covering socio-demographic data. The results obtained through the comparison of groups, indicated that women presented higher levels of perceived stress than men. On the other hand, amateur athletes reported higher levels of perceived stress than professional athletes. The results of the difference analysis shows that the perception of stress depends on sex and performance level were predictors of perceived stress. Alternate :Una de las principales consecuencias negativas de la actual pandemia por COVID-19, es el impacto sobre la ansiedad y el estrés. Entre los factores que se deben tomar en cuenta para evaluar la respuesta psicosocial de los deportistas ante el COVID-19, están los factores sociodemográficos, por lo que el objetivo del presente estudio fue analizar si la percepción de estrés depende del sexo y el nivel de rendimiento en deportistas mexicanos durante la pandemia por COVID-19. La muestra de este estudio estuvo conformada por 596 deportistas mexicanos, de ambos sexos (mujeres = 40.4%) y con edades comprendidas entre los 13 y 40 años (M = 22.3, DE = 6.87). Los deportistas contestaron la Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10) y un cuestionario para indagar sobre aspectos sociodemográficos. Los resultados obtenidos a través de la comparación de grupos, indicaron que las mujeres presentaron niveles superiores de estrés percibido que los hombres. Por otro lado, los deportistas de nivel amateur reportaron niveles más altos que los deportistas profesionales. Los resultados del análisis de diferencia muestran que la percepción de estrés depende del sexo y nivel de rendimiento. Estos resultados podrían utilizarse para incrementar la eficacia de los protocolos aplicados para controlar el estrés durante la pandemia por COVID-19 en deportistas.Alternate :Uma das principais consequências negativas da atual pandemia de COVID-19 é o impacto na ansiedade e no estresse. Entre os fatores que devem ser levados em consideração para avaliar a resposta psicossocial dos atletas ao COVID-19, estão os fatores sociodemográficos, portanto, o objetivo deste estudo foi analisar se a percepção do estresse depende do gênero e do nível de atividade. atletas durante a pandemia de COVID-19. A amostra deste estudo foi composta por 596 atletas mexicanos, de ambos os sexos (mulheres = 40,4%) e com idade entre 13 e 40 anos (M = 22,3, DP = 6,87). Os atletas responderam à Escala de Estresse Percebido (PSS-10) e a um questionário para indagar sobre aspectos sociodemográficos. Os resultados obtidos pela comparação dos grupos indicaram que as mulheres apresentaram níveis de estresse percebido mais elevados do que os homens. Por outro lado, os atletas de nível amador relataram níveis mais elevados do que os atletas profissionais. Os resultados da análise de diferenças mostram que a percepção do estresse depende do gênero e do nível de desempenho. Esses resultados podem ser usados ​​para aumentar a eficácia dos protocolos aplicados para controlar o estresse durante a pandemia de COVID-19 em atletas.

A Comparison of Machine Learning Methods for best Accuracy COVID-19 Diagnosis Using Chest X-Ray Images

Coronavirus (COVID-19) changed the view of people towards life in all the countries of the world in December 2019. The virus has made chaos that cannot be predicted. This problem requires using a variety of technologies to aid in the identification of COVID-19 patients and to control the disease spread. For suspected instances of COVID-19 disease, chest X-ray (CXR) imaging is a standard with fewer costs, but it does not need a COVID-19 examination approach without using technology to help for a suitable diagnosis. In response to this issue, a big dataset of CXR images was divided into four classes found on the website Kaggle. Dealing with large data of the images needs dataset reprocessing through choosing the optimal method for getting speed and best accuracy. Dataset reprocessing converts into gray level then adjust image intensity, resize and extract the best features then apply Machine Learning ML models. The use of different prediction models, ML algorithms, and their performances are calculated with evaluation on the dataset after reprocessing. Decision Tree (DT), Random Forest (RF), Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD), Logistic Regression (LR), Gaussian Naive Bayes (GNB), and K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN) are models used to foretell the specialized who would be diagnosed with COVID-19 quickly by using CXR images classification. The KNN has revealed the best accuracy compared with the others such as GNB, DT, SGD, LR, and RF. Also, KNN has the best-weighted average for all parameters, which are precision, sensitivity, and F1-score compared with the other models. © 2022 IEEE.

Acute Pancreatitis Related to COVID-19 Infection: A Systematic Review and Analysis of Data.

There is increasing literature mentioning severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection (COVID-19 infection) causing acute pancreatitis (AP). It is hypothesized that SARS-Cov-2 causes pancreatic injury either by direct cytotoxic effect of the virus on pancreatic cells through the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptors - the main receptors for the virus located on pancreatic cells - or by the cytokine storm that results from COVID-19 infection or a component of both. Many viruses are related to AP including mumps, coxsackievirus, cytomegalovirus (CMV), Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), and as data evolves SARS-CoV-2 virus may be one of them as well. We conducted a systematic literature review to explore the current literature and provide an overview of the evidence of AP in COVID-19 infection. We studied the presence of AP in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection and calculated the time of diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection with respect to the time of diagnosis of AP. We also studied the age, gender, clinical manifestations, time of onset of symptoms, laboratory values, imaging findings, mortality, length of stay, comorbidities, need for Intensive Care Unit (ICU) care, and excluded any other common causes of AP. We included 40 articles comprising 46 patients. All patients had a positive SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test and all patients had AP as per Atlanta's criteria. The most common clinical presentation was abdominal pain in 29 (63.0%). Edematous pancreas was the most common Computed Tomography Abdomen Pelvis (CTAP) scan finding in these patients (35 patients). Seventeen (37%) patients required ICU admission and six (13%) patients died. Our study provides an important overview of the available data on AP in COVID-19 patients and concludes that AP is an important complication in COVID-19 infection and should be considered as an important differential in patients with COVID-19 infection who complain of abdominal pain.

Dengue outbreak in the times of COVID-19 pandemic: Common myths associated with the dengue.

With the sharp rise in dengue cases across the state and the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, it is crucial to pay attention to the common misbelieves among the population about dengue. It should be considered to actively spread awareness about the disease to bust the common myths associated with it. A few common myths include that it is a contagious disease, or it is a milder infection than COVID-19, so it's not taken more seriously, or that one cannot be coinfected with both dengue and COVID-19 at one time. We propose that accurate information about dengue can be spread through community education through televisions and social media to cater to the targeted audience. In addition to that, awareness campaigns in rural areas should be planned to help the masses understand the pathogenesis of the diseases and play a role in limiting the transmission.

Interventions and Impact of Pharmacist-Delivered Services for People Infected with COVID-19: A Systematic Review.

Pharmacists are essential members of the healthcare team. The emergence of the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has led pharmacists to undertake additional clinical roles. We aim to conduct a systematic review on the interventions and impact of pharmacist-delivered services in managing COVID-19 patients. We searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, CINAHL plus, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, and Web of Science from 1 December 2019 (the first case of COVID-19 emerged) to 13 January 2022 to retrieve the articles. Cochrane handbook and PRISMA guidelines were followed respectively to perform and report the review. The pharmacist-led interventions were reported following the Descriptive Elements of Pharmacist Intervention Characterization Tool (DEPICT) version 2. The protocol of systematic review was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42021277128). Studies quality was assessed with the modified NOS scale. In total, 7 observational studies were identified from 10,838 studies. Identification of dosage errors (n = 6 studies), regimen modifications (n = 5), removal of obsolete/duplicate medications (n = 5), identification and management of adverse drug reactions (n = 4), drug interactions prevention (n = 2), and physicians acceptance rate (n = 3) of therapy-related services delivered in-person or via tele-pharmacy were among the pharmacist-delivered services. Common interventions delivered by pharmacists also included optimizing the use of antibacterial, antivirals, and anticoagulants in COVID-19 infected patients. The acceptance of pharmacist-delivered services by physicians was high (88.5-95.5%). Included studies have described pharmacists' beneficial role in managing patients with COVID-19 including detection, resolution, and prevention of medication-related problems, with physicians demonstrating high trust in pharmacists' advice. Future research should assess the feasibility and scalability of such roles in real-world settings.

Acute Pancreatitis during COVID-19 Pandemic: An Overview of Patient Demographics, Disease Severity, Management and Outcomes in Western Health and Social Care Trust

Background Acute pancreatitis is a common disease requiring admissions under surgical and critical care units. The two most common causes are alcohol and gallstones. COVID-19 pandemic had a significant impact on service delivery and patient management throughout all surgical specialties. In this study, primary aim was to ascertain incidence of COVID-19 in acute pancreatitis patients. Secondary objectives were to study aetiology, demographics, severity, 30 day mortality, outcomes and management of acute pancreatitis patients from Altnagelvin Area Hospital from 1st March, 2020 till 30th August, 2020. Methods A retrospective observational review of all patients admitted under General Surgical team from March 2020 till September 2020 was performed. Information regarding demographics, severity of acute pancreatitis (using Glasgow score, Atlanta classification and CT severity index score), ICU admission and organ support, treatment modalities and follow-up data for outcomes was collected based on RedCap tool used by COVID-PAN study. The results were compared to outcomes results of COVID-PAN study for COVID-19 negative patients in that study as we had only one patient who was positive for COVID-19 at time of concomitant pancreatitis diagnosis. Results Forty four (44) patients were admitted with acute pancreatitis. Only one patient (2.3%) was diagnosed with COVID-19 at time of pancreatitis. Aetiology of pancreatitis was found comparable to aetiology reported by large scale studies (2). Mortality was 7% (3 patients). Five patients (11%) needed ICU admission due to organ dysfunction. Three patients (7%) developed ARDS.  Conclusions The overall incidence of COVID-19 in pancreatitis in our population of study was low. Therefore, results were compared to patients who were COVID-19 negative in COVID-PAN study. Patients with acute pancreatitis in our target population were mostly elderly, about one in five had moderate to severe or severe pancreatitis and in 16.3% the aetiology could not be identified. As has been observed in other centres globally, urgent for gallstone pancreatitis faced significant delays with no patients being offered index cholecystectomy and only 4 out of 19 patients having undergone interval cholecystectomy.